Tuesday, April 26, 2016

Combatting Witchgrass with Mulch Posted By Joe Mc.

Combatting
Witchgrass
with Mulch


in asparagus, grapes, rhubarb, blackberries and other perennials
and
anywhere else it's not wanted.


by Tom Roberts, 

Click on photos to enlarge.
In case you are not familiar with it, witchgrass is everpresent in Maine, especially in pastures and fields. It spreads via rhizomes, or underground stems, which sprout up new spears of grass every few inches. It can withstand frequent cutting, grazing or mowing and keeps coming back. Like most grasses, it loves cool wet weather.

When the gardener tries to pull it up, the rhizomes break off in the ground, making it very difficult to eradicate that way. Tilling breaks the rhizomes into hundreds of small pieces, each of which sprouts a new plant, although any left entirely on the surface in dry weather will dry out and die in a few days.

When tilling witchgrass in the garden, it is advisable to go very slowly, thus breaking the rhizomes into the smallest possible pieces. That way, although there will be more sprouts of grass emerging, there will be less energy per rhizome piece, so subsequent control become easier. When the new sprouts have exactly three leaves on them, the rhizome has put out a maximum amount of energy without getting much back yet. This is the point at which pulling or re-tilling works best.

But what about witchgrass in perennial crops where tilling is not an option? Over the years we have discovered several mulching methods which do not work. These include mulching with new grass clippings, hay, leaves, pine needles, or wood chips. They do not work because the energy reserves the witchgrass allow it within a few months to grow its sharp pointed rhizomes upward to the light, and then sprout leaves of grass to the point that it is now growing stronger than ever.

But that doesn't mean that mulching doesn't work, it just means that a simple layer of mulch doesn't work. What we have developed over the past ten years is a method that does work, and we use several variations of it.

The secret is to cover the witchgrass with a layer of cardboard (or many layers of newspaper) and then cover this with a layer of hay, leaves, grass or wood chips, which will serve not only to hold the bottom layer in place, but to help it biodegrade over time as well as improve the appearance of the mulched area. In the photo to the right, which is a closeup of the photo at the very top of this page, I first added a layer of compost to the blackberry beds, then covered this with cardboard (either cereal box cardboard or corrugated) then added a layer of wood chips. Before putting down the compost, I spent some time pulling all the witchgrass rhizomes out that I could, just to increase my chances of success. In many places it was just like digging into a plate of spaghetti, the roots were so thick.

You will find the process much easier if it is done in late fall or early spring when the grass is not growing. Alternatively, during the growing season you can mow the grass very close, then use the mowings as part of your top mulch. (The fresh tops won't root; only the underground rhizomes will propagate the plant.) Next, lay down overlapping layers of newspaper or cardboard. If using newspapers, use about 20 sheets per layer—we use folded newspapers about a quarter inch thick and overlap them by at least six inches. The work goes much easier if the newspaper or cardboard has been left out in the rain or soaked in a tub overnight. This keeps the wind from blowing them as you work, and removes any stiffness, which makes it easier to cover irregularities in the ground.
In the above photos, Jill is putting down an overlapping layer of newspapers on mowed witchgrass in the rhubarb patch in late May, then covering these with leaves. Note how the newspapers are tucked in under the rhubarb plants, and how much the newspapers are overlapped. At right, in the same rhubarb patch the following November, you can see why the newspapers need to be overlapped more than was done in May. The grass was able to find its way between the papers and emerge, weakened, but ready to catch up. So remember to overlap your bottom layer quite well. You will note that the second bed over has much better witchgrass control, since the newspapers were overlapped more.

Another thing we have learned is that, altho the two layer system works well, the fact that the newspaper layer is biodegrading at the same time the witchgrass is trying to poke through it means that sometimes some of the witchgrass will get through. Other times witch grass will be invading from the edges of the mulched patch. This will be evident within a few months, and usually happens only in a few patches here and there. What we have learned to do is to apply the very same method again the following year. The second time, the grass is weaker and sparser, and the mulching even more effective. Once you've killed the witchgrass, it is gone, and won't be coming back. However, it may be forever invading from the edges of your planting, so re-applying the two-layer mulch may become an annual or biennial necessity, at least in certain patches.

In the photo to the left, you can see the grape arbor as it appeared in early November. The area in the foreground was mulched with hay-over-newspaper in the spring of the previous year, and now eighteen months later the grass is well on its way to recovering. Further back, you can see where we applied the hay-over-newspaper again in the spring of this year, and there is essentially no witchgrass in that section. Prior to our initial application of the mulch two years ago, the grass was as thick as I've ever seen it, very much enjoying the leaves-only mulch I had used several years previously.

We are always saving pizza boxes, cereal boxes and any cardboard boxes we come across. Mulching the eighty foot long Blackberry Garden this October used up two years worth of cardboard hoarding. Better to use too much than too little. Last year we were fortunate enough to have someone deliver us a van of bundled newspapers, and to date we've used about a third of those.

What is our preference for the top layer? Generally whatever is available. During the summer months we are mowing the fields every few weeks so we have a good supply of young hay. Sometimes we have a large pile of wood chips that we make ourselves or is delivered to us. And as you can see in ourUsing Mulches article, we get pine needles, hay and leaves delivered to us every fall by the good residents of Pittsfield. For each of these we have other uses as well, besides using them for the top layer in our witchgrass battle. So whenever we are applying our two-layer mulch, we look around to see what's in surplus for the top layer.

Chips or sawdust as a top layer will last the longest, although for mulching witchgrass it is the bottom layer, not the top layer, which determines effectiveness. Leaves, pine needles and old hay are the second longest lasting, but loose leaves have a tendency to blow off exposing the bottom layer if they are in a windy location. Old hay may itself contain grass seeds (but not witchgrass seeds, for witchgrass produces few if any viable seeds). Young hay and grass clipping are the shortest lived, completely disappearing by the following year.

The lack of longevity of the bottom layer is surprising to most people. Newspaper and cardboard when kept moist and in contact with the soil will biodegrade almost completely during the first season with the help of micobes and earthworms. Meanwhile, if applied thickly and overlapped enough, it will have done its job. Then bottom of the top layer will then begin to decompose, slowly feeding your plants.

Adding a layer of compost prior to the application of the newspaper or cardboard layer is a way of feeding your plants an even better diet than the decomposing mulch would be. Compared to simple layer of compost on the top of the ground, compost under the mulch will remain moist decomposing and combining with the soil more completely.

Thursday, April 21, 2016

The Intellectual Case For Trump II: The Culture Warrior

If you can’t be bothered to read it, don’t bother responding...
 
An Excerpt...
A candidate like Donald Trump should be impossible. A loud, unscripted, hard-edged reality show-style candidate with exceedingly flexible positions on many hot-button issues would be laughed out of contention for the Republican nomination in other years. A man whose serial gaffes and willingness to stick his thumb in the eye of the gatekeepers of good taste would be cooked before he stepped onto the debate stage.  An utterly inexperienced politician, who describes our rights and privileges as particular to us as Americans rather than universal moral mandates, would be rejected by both parties at any other time in the modern era.

But in Trump’s case, these supposedly disqualifying positions and attributes have proven to be the basis for unexpected success. Why? In part, it is because he corrects massive ideological failures by the Right, which have enabled unmitigated cultural overreach by the Left, eliminating the social and cultural basis that permits a Western liberal order to exist.

For decades, the institutional Right has ceded American culture to the Left, in spite of many voices who pointed out ample areas where the Right could carve out a countercultural movement against leftist domination, or even co-opt some of modern culture for itself

The cause of this is partially a denial of how swiftly the culture has moved Left, leaving the institutional Right under the false impression it is still fighting the culture war of the 90’s and early 2000s. The Right’s obsession with 90’s-era battles over sex, drugs, and rock and roll is more than just an anachronism: it represents a self-inflicted wound that ignored how the Left used the culture to repeatedly make the case for their vision of an ideal society. We now know the Left won that war, and in this context, Trump represents the first candidate for whom success could only come after a culture war apocalypse.
 
 
More at...
 
All the best
jcmcd

May activities at the FML




Weekly Toddler and Pre-School Story Time
Wednesdays 10:30-11:30am
Each week features a theme, music, and a craft

Read with Oreo
Wednesday May, 18th 3:00-4:00pm.
School age children are invited to the library to read a story with Oreo the Reading Dog.

Books & Cooks
Berri-licous  Smoothies
Wednesday May 18, 2016
Grades 2 and up 3:00-4:00pm

Wacky Wii Night!
Monday May 23, 2016
5:00-6:30pm
Join in the fun for an evening of Wii Games on the big screen in our community room. Try your hand at Wii sports or maybe Dance, Dance Revolution. It’s sure to be an awesome time

Crafty Tuesdays
Grades K-6
3:00-4:00pm
May 4thMother’s Day is almost here again. Let’s get together and make something special for all the moms, grandmas, or special women in our lives.
May 10th- No crafts this week
May 17thPearler Beads- It’s time to experiment with our favorite melty beads again. Make a magnet, or a key chain. The possibilities are endless!
May 24thWind Spirals- Plastic water bottles will be transformed into colorful outside decorations.
May 31stSeashell Extravaganza- Crafters will have the opportunity to experiment with seashells to see what types of cool art they can create.

                          Crazy 8’s Math Club!
                            Grades 3-5
Thursdays from 3:00-4:00pm
May 5th, 12th, 19th,26th
Club limited to 16 participants- REGISTRATION IS REQUIRED

Crazy 8’s is an over-the-top after-school club that is designed to get kids fired up about math. Every week kids get to build stuff, run and jump,make music, make a mess..and make friendships at the same time. It’s time for math to become the cool thing to do after school!


--
Sacha Krawczyk
Youth Services Librarian
Fletcher Memorial Library
Ludlow, Vermont 05149802-228-3517

Tuesday, April 19, 2016

Next BRACC Meeting

The next BRACC meeting will be on Tuesday, April 26 at 5:00 P.M. at the Coolidge Room of Black River High School, 43 Main Street, Ludlow.  (Someone will be at the south entrance to direct you to the meeting.)
 We will be making final plans for the After Prom party, Sticker Shock and discuss other local issues.  Please make plans to attend.  
In case you missed it, here is a link to Steve Waldo’s presentation for parents:  Steve Waldo presentation
 
BRACC--promoting a healthy involved community, supporting all youth in safe environments. 
Brigid Sullivan, Coordinator
Black River Area Community Coalition
PO Box 197
Ludlow, VT 05149
Phone/fax (802) 228-7878
bracc7878@yahoo.com 

Mount Holly SELECT BOARD APRIL 12, 2016

SELECT BOARD 
APRIL 12, 2016 

The meeting was called to order at 7:30pm by Ted Crawford, chair. Ray Tarbell and Tim Martin were present. All stood and recited the Pledge of Allegiance. 1. Additions/Deletions to the Agenda: There were several additions to the Agenda. Under Planning Commission, a resignation letter, and under Other, an alarm system at Fire/Rescue and a request from the Odd Fellows. 2. Minutes:  The minutes of the regular meeting of March 08 were sent out before the meeting for review. Ted asked that the following sentence be added as part of the Hazard Mitigation discussion: “Ted noted that the work of the Hazard Mitigation Committee was complete and thanked all of the committee members for their contributions to this project.” Upon motion made and seconded it was VOTED: To approve the March 08 minutes as amended. (3-0) 3. Highways  Grants update: Jeff provided some additional photos for the Better Roads grants, as requested. At this point we wait to hear if we receive any grant  Mower: Jeff presented several options on replacing the 2006 Woods mower, which needs about $2500 in repairs to try and get another season out of it. Options ranged from $5000 for a rental (limited time frame) to purchasing new, which would allow work to be done over the entire season. Purchase options range from $9400 to $11000 for a PTS driven mower to $15640 to $18540 for a flail mower. Jeff also noted that the town could look at purchasing a tractor with a backhoe attachment as well, which could run to $50,000 or more. The Board deferred a decision until next meeting, to get more information. Don Patch suggested looking at a lease-to-buy option rather than outright purchase.  GMP Pole locations along Russellville Road: The Board reviewed a request from GMP to install poles and wires within the town highway right of way along Russellville Road. This is part of a pole relocation project that has been under discussion for about two years. Upon motion made and seconded it was VOTED: To approve the GMP request to install poles and wires in the town highway right of way along Russellville Road as proposed. (3-0) 4. Report of Treasurer  David Johnson presented an income and expense statement dated March 31, 2016 showing cash balances of $1,796,733. Highlights: Delinquent taxes: An updated report just after April 1 shows delinquent taxes down to $85,500. New bills have been sent requesting the setup of payment plans or the tax sale process will begin. A prior year’s delinquencies have been clear up, either by payment or tax sale. Income and Expenses: Solid Waste label sales are running $900 ahead of last year and meet the budgeted amount, while expenses are more than budgeted, mainly due to the increased recycling costs. The recently completed workers comp audit showed the premium was based on VLCT’s (too low) estimate rather than the town’s estimates, and will likely result in additional premium expense. Highway equipment repairs remain under budget; winter labor and materials are slightly under budget. New sand screen expenses, including a metal cutting saw, were not in the budget, but overall the finances are in good shape. 5. Transfer Station –Nothing to report this month. 6. Planning Commission  Rutland Regional Planning Commission (RRPC): Don Richardson reported that the RRPC continues to work on the review of completed town plans. He also noted that there continues to be submissions for review of several large (150kW and larger) solar projects around the county. Also, the energy legislation that passed the Senate has gone to the House, which will likely make changes and send it back to the Senate.  Rutland Regional Transportation Advisory Council (TAC): TAC continues to monitor the State’s infrastructure priorities, which so far keep Route 140 and Route 155 as 1 and 2 respectively but no actual work is likely until 2017 . Mount Holly also has a bridge on the State project list (#17, over the Mill River), but that priority is 39th out of 46. David (Hoeh) and Don also keep prominent the issue of increasing tractor trailer traffic on Route 103, which affects Mount Holly (demonstrated by the recent accident near Mac’s Store in East Wallingford).  Resignation: The Town received a letter of resignation from the Administrative Officer, Nicole Griffin. March 31 is her last day.  Notice of Vacancy for Planning Commission Clerk: Ted reported that the PC requested that the town seek candidates for a Planning Commission Clerk. Tim Martin noted that may not be correct, and the Board postponed this item pending clarification after the next PC meeting, scheduled for April 18.  LEOP Update: The Local Emergency Operations Plan (LEOP) has been updated with new names and contact information, such as the new fire chief. Otherwise, the plan is the same. Upon motion made and seconded it was VOTED: To approve the LEOP as updated. (3-0) Ted will clarify where the LEOP needs to be signed, and then forward it on as required. 7. Other Business  Hedgehog Hill Wind Farm: The town had received 5 notices regarding this project: a) 03/23/16 notice of Motion to Intervene by Ruth Dickey and Pam Myers; b) 03/28/16 Comments and a Request for Hearing by Ron Unterman (thru attorney); c) 03/28/16 Motion to Intervene by Greg Durgin; d) 03/29/16 Comments and Request for Hearing by Ruth Dickey and Pam Myers; e) 04/04/16 notice of Motion to Intervene and Comments by Carol and Griffin Ballou.  US Census Bureau: The town received the 2016 Governments Units Survey. Rhonda will complete online before the April 29 deadline.  Countryside Lock and Alarm sent the town a letter regarding new legislation on required fire alarm systems for all EMS buildings. This will be forwarded to Fire and Rescue.  Odd Fellows requests: The Odd Fellows is requesting that the town provided assistance with the cost of mowing. The bid went up $50-100 (the dam reconstruction has created larger area to be mowed?). Also, the group would like assistance with the installation of a motion light ($500 estimate). David Johnson was asked to get clarification from C. Devereux and Odd Fellows regarding the mowing, and also the light.  Village Center Designation Renewal for Belmont: David Hoeh noted that the designation has been reaffirmed, which is valid for 5 years (to 2021). He provided a new map that RRPC had prepared for the town. 8. The Board reviewed and signed the March orders for payment. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned by motion made, seconded and approved, at 8:07 pm. Respectfully submitted, Rhonda Rivers Minutes are DRAFT until approved at a Select Board meeting. Approved on: ___________

Monday, April 18, 2016

The Agency of Education Gets Busted For Unlawful Teacher Licensing Requirements

From: Joseph McDonald 


 
 

Under the Radar: The Agency of Education Gets Busted For Unlawful Teacher Licensing Requirements

Legislative hearings on a sleeper of a bill, S. 217, have had the unintended consequence of exposing the Agency of Education’s long-standing unlawful teacher licensing process, as explained below, with important financial implications for taxpayers generally and even more serious legal and financial implications for teachers, schools and the Agency itself.
First of all, the unlawful system drives up both property taxes and income taxes. By statute, a person cannot be employed as a "teacher" in a public school without a valid license. 16 V.S.A. § 1692. However, the Agency of Education, and the Vermont Standards Board for Professional[1] (a lay body with a teacher majority membership) have created a licensing process that requires every general teacher’s license to carry a specific “endorsement.”[2] There are now 44 different endorsements (six for administrators and the rest for various categories of teachers). Dividing up the duties of teacher in this way, while prohibiting schools from employing teachers in areas outside of their endorsement area[3], contributes to overstaffing in schools. The system requires specialists and prohibits generalists. More teachers means more local staff cost for schools paid for by property taxes. It also means more members of the teachers’ retirement fund, a big chunk of the general fund, which is largely supported by the income tax.
The second problem is that the unlawful system is expensive for teachers. To be eligible for a particular endorsement a teacher must meet very specific requirements for education and experience and demonstrate competency in certain skill areas. Separate ongoing professional development requirements for renewing a license apply to each endorsement. If a teacher has more than one endorsement the cost of meeting initial licensure and professional development requirements is increased.
Finally, the unlawful system has created more state employees. The Agency of Education has an entire licensing division devoted to determining whether teachers meet endorsement requirements. Licensing fees primarily fund the positions but the retirement costs are yet another general fund expenditure.
So why is the teacher licensing system unlawful? As recently discovered and exposed by the Vermont Secretary of State’s Office, AOE and the Standards Board have created these endorsements completely outside of Vermont’s statutory requirements for rule making.[4]This came to light because over the years AOE has expanded its’ endorsement turf to capture professions, like speech language pathologists and psychologists, already regulated by the Secretary of State’s office. S. 217 is intended to put an end to dual licensure and require a study of statewide licensure with an eye towards consolidation. As the hearings became contentious and turfy the Secretary of State made good on its commitment to transparency by taking a close look at the endorsement requirements.  Here’s what the Deputy Secretary of State had had to say:
“Endorsements are promulgated by the VSBPE (Standards Board) outside of the APA (Administrative Procedure Act) process…. It is well established and self evident that “when an agency adopts policy or procedure it should not supplant or avoid the adoption of rules.” See 3 V.S.A. § 800(4).
He goes on to point out a very specific APA rulemaking provision designed to control education costs:
“If a rule affects or provides for the regulation of public education and public schools, the agency proposing the rule shall evaluate the cost implications to local school districts and school taxpayers, clearly state the associated costs, and report them in a local school cost impact statement to be filed with the economic impact statement on the rule required by subsection 838(c) of this title. An agency proposing a rule affecting school districts shall also consider and include in the local school cost impact statement an evaluation of alternatives to the rule, including no rule on the subject which would reduce or ameliorate costs to local school districts while achieving the objectives or purposes of the proposed rule. The legislative committee on administrative rules may object to any proposed rule if a local school cost impact statement is not filed with the proposed rule, or the committee finds the statement to be inadequate, in the same manner in which the committee may object to an economic impact statement under section 842 of this title. 3 V.S.A. § 832(b).”
Senate Government Operations S.217
By ignoring the rule-making process both the Agency of Education and the Standards Board have avoided public input, cost analysis and legislative oversight. Then there’s the issue of enforcing “rules” that arguably don’t have the force and effect of law. [5]The implications here are staggering. How this gets sorted out is the responsibility of the Governor’s office and quite possibly the courts. Now that the Governor has direct supervisory authority over the Secretary of Education he needs to exercise it by insisting that teacher endorsements are subject to immediate rulemaking. The legislature in turn should take this as a lesson in why professional licensure should be housed entirely within an agency that understands and respects its’ legal obligations and its’ responsibility to the public.
We believe Campaign for Vermont offers substantive insight, information and advocacy on a non-partisan basis relative to Vermont's affordability crisis. We hope you have found value in the above presentation. A contribution of $50 dollars, $100 dollars or more would be greatly appreciated and well used to keep us working hard for you. We do recognize that not all of our supporters can afford this so a donation in any amount is highly valued. Please renew that support with a donation.
And visit us on Facebook or Twitter too!
Best,

Barbara Crippen
Policy Coordinator



[1] Regulatory authority over licensing was transferred from the State Board of Education to the Vermont Standards Board. The Agency of Education has a full time staff issuing licenses, a Deputy Secretary for Educator Quality and attorneys and investigators preforming functions related to educator misconduct and/or incompetence complaints.
[2] Rules 5220.2 and 5440, Licensing of Educators and Preparation of Education Professionals.
[3] Rule 5220.7
[4] 3 V.S.A. Chpt. 25.
[5] See Parker v. Gorczyk, 170 Vt. 263 (1999).
posted by CFV | 7pt

Thursday, April 14, 2016

International Musician To Perform In Mount Holly





International Musician To Perform In Mount Holly
A concert featuring vocalist, musician and songwriter Amanda Rogers will be held on Saturday, April 16, at the Mount Holly Community Center.  Amanda Rogers is as resourceful as she is versatile when it comes to her craft of songwriting. Drawing from both the whimsical depths of her mind and the tangible world around her, her music speaks of Amanda's many recollected stories while navigating life with an "old soul of a gypsy" and the precise moments of finding true love, home, and balance. Amanda's penchant and ability to write catchy hooks and addictive melodies is reminiscent of the classic songwriting from the 50's, 60's, and 70's, splashed with the raw-edges and fearlessness of today. Amanda will be on tour this year, so don’t miss this opportunity to hear her and welcome her back to Mount Holly. The concert begins at 7:00 P.M. The Mount Holly Community Center is located across the Village Baptist Church green in Belmont, Vermont. ($10 donation suggested)